“Hoons” of all ages

by Bob on January 7, 2009

Reading recent news stories, a person could think I’m crazy when I praise drivers in Australia for being generally law-abiding and courteous.

In The Australian for Monday there’s a report of two cars that police clocked driving just over the 100kph (62 mph) speed limit near a town called Gatton, west of Brisbane.  Not unusual, of course, except that the second car was maintaining a steady distance from the one in front, a distance of three to four meters.

As my brother Ronald would be quick to point out, those cars were moving at a rate of about 28 meters (or 91 feet) per second, so the second car was not even one eye blink behind the first.

The driver, 31, claimed he was “slipstreaming” to save petrol.  Maybe he’d spent his last dime on beer.  He was charged with “drink-driving.”

That’s the term for it here in Australia.  Not “drunk driving” or “driving while under the influence,” but drink-driving.

Also west of Brisbane one night last year (I’m beginning to wonder about driving west of Brisbane), police found a 37-year-old woman sitting in her car in the middle of a highway with no lights on.

Technically, she could argue she wasn’t driving, I suppose, but she could hardly contest her blood alcohol level.  At 0.379, she was eight times over the limit.  Standing without help was a problem for her.

But it’s not just the youngsters in their 30s who astound police and the general public.  ABC (that’s Australian Broadcasting Corporation) just reported on-line that a man in Victoria is the country’s oldest hoon.

“Hoon” means “show-off,” but the press seems to reserve it for bad actors in cars, speeding or otherwise driving dangerously on public streets and roads.

Which is what you could say a guy was doing New Years Day on (aptly named?) Brandy Creek Road in Warragula when he was clocked doing 170kph (106 mph) in a 100kph zone.

Like the slipstreamer, he was following closely behind a younger driver, someone in his dangerous 30s.  The lead driver is 36.  The follower, on a winding, 6-meter-wide road, is 78 years old.

Both men have had their licenses suspended, for life, I hope.  Both have had their cars impounded (and sold for scrap, I wish).  Getting their cars back will cost them $600 each.

Officers said the old f… (excuse me, I almost used a bad word)… the old fellow illustrated the fact that we all think we’re above-average drivers by protested that he is a skilled driver capable of handling such speeds.  That ploy got him nowhere, though, as the officer correctly observed that it’s hard to see how anyone can be competent at 170kph on a road with other drivers travelling at normal speeds or less.

The year is young and already Australian policemen have confiscated 42 cars. ABC says they were taken from drivers “across a range of ages.”  At the top: a 78-year-old with a death wish, little wisdom, and no evident regard for others.

He calls to mind the story about an old guy who used his cell phone to call his wife as he was driving home from a doctor’s office.

“Oh, I’m so glad to hear your voice,” she said.  “I was so worried.  The television says there’s some idiot driving the wrong way on the Interstate highway.”

Some idiot,” he replied.  “There are hundreds of them!”

{ 0 comments }

Blog 102, an admission

by Bob on January 1, 2009

I didn’t keep my promise. I said I’d offer my brother Ronald’s five rules of safe driving “tomorrow,” and that “tomorrow” was yesterday.  I didn’t make it.  Midnight came too soon.

The day I’d promised to deliver “No-carnage driving” was also last year: 2008.  Now, here in Australia, we’re an hour into 2009.  As I was finishing up that blog, I could hear fireworks greeting the new year.

I could claim that it’s still 2008 in Texas, in the US, and in lots of places around the world.  It’s about 10 after 9 a.m. where Ronald and Mike and their families live. But I won’t.

Instead, I’ll just note that my last 2008 blog was my 100th one on this blog site.  My adviser on such matters, Kathy Hendershot-Hurd, says 100 is the minimum for blogging success and viability. So, okay, I guess I can claim I’m a blogger, now.

Happy New Year to you from a Texan who is at home far from home.  Drive safely.  — Bob

P.S. Having experienced more than an hour of it, I can tell you that 2009 looks like a fine year.  Granted, I haven’t read any news reports yet, but so far, so good.

{ 2 comments }

No-carnage driving: Ronald’s five rules

by Bob on January 1, 2009

As promised, here are five practices that have kept my brother Ronald accident-free despite a long life of driving, in a Texas Department of Public Safety patrol car and as a private citizen:

Aim high in steering The farther down the road you see while driving (and he’s talking about “seeing, not just looking”), the less likely you are to have a wreck, he says, adding “Be aware of what’s going on around you.”

Keep your eyes moving – Eye movement helps keep you from getting into a driving trance, the fixed stare of the driver whose mind is elsewhere while her/his ton of metal is moving at up to a 100 feet a second.  Eye movement makes drowsiness less likely, too, and makes it more likely you’ll frequently check your rear-view mirror.

Our dad taught Ronald that, I suspect, since I learned, as Daddy was teaching me to drive, that I should move my eyes constantly in a regular pattern: ahead, rear view mirror, right side, left side, speedometer, and ahead again.

Get the big picture –
Practices one and two help you stay aware of what’s around you, but there’s more, including road conditions, weather, and any changes in the condition of your vehicle, including fuel level, engine temperature, electrical systems, and any abnormal vibrations or sounds.

Make sure you are seen –
You can’t assume other drivers are aiming high, keeping their eyes moving, and getting the big picture.  They may not have noticed that you’re hurtling in their direction.  Having your headlights on makes you more visible and they take no extra fuel, Ronald notes, so, “Turn ‘em on,” day and night.

Even then, though, don’t assume that other drivers have noted your presence or your turn signal that’s blinking or even, heaven help us, the red light facing them as you both approach an intersection.

Leave yourself an out – Where can you go (to the median? to the shoulder?) if something happens suddenly just ahead of your car?  If you’ve been aiming high, moving your eyes around, and getting the big picture, you’re more likely to know what to do when faced with the need for a sudden change in flight path.

“Always try to have an escape route because it matters little who is right or wrong in bad situations, staying out of any ‘mess’ is the very most important thing,” he writes.

“Watch out for the other idiots on the highway,” Mother used to tell us, and that’s an admonition worth thinking about.  Be alert to the erratic and risky behavior of other drivers, Ronald says.  His five rules, if we observe them, can make us safer from the other idiots and from our own idiocy, too.

Another brother of ours, Stan, used to speak of intending to practice “Buddhist driving.”  I understand that he meant non-aggressive, highly aware driving (”Be here now.”), which Ronald’s five rules make more likely.

So review the five and practice them.  They come from someone trained in police work, someone who has had to see, up close, a lot of highway carnage that could have been avoided.
They come from someone who has driven for decades on wild Texas roads and managed to never have a wreck.  Maybe he knows what he’s talking about.

{ 0 comments }

“I found the drivers to be more courteous there,” a friend of ours at the University of Queensland gym told me and Kristi last week after he’d returned from his first visit to the United States.

Wait a minute, I replied.  I’ve been telling people that the drivers here, in Australia, are more courteous.

How could this be?  Darren flies to the US, rents a car, drives on the right-hand side of the road for the first time in his life, does that in California, and returns talking about how courteous American drivers are!

We move here, adapt to driving on the left, learn to find our way around Brisbane’s often narrow and twisting streets, and I conclude that, bless them, Australian drivers are more courteous than American drivers.

Maybe, I concluded, something about being a novice driver in a strange land of odd rules was the reason both Darren and I perceived the drivers of each other’s home country to be more courteous than the ones we’ve always known.

Maybe, being intimidated by newness in a dangerous situation (driving), we were more timid and, therefore, maybe we drove more courteously.  Maybe that caused us to feel that those around us in all those other cars were more cautious, too, more courteous.

Maybe.  US cars themselves, Darren and I agree, are huge, compared to the average car on the roads here.  When Kristi and I were driving Texas streets and highways in recent weeks, we felt [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

A warm AU Christmas? Not so bad!

by Bob on December 24, 2008

Christmas in Brisbane this year will be not much different — in temperature — from Christmas in any of the places we’d likely be if we were spending the holiday in Texas.

True, it is summer here in the Southern Hemisphere and our Christmas Day high is projected to be 80 degrees Fahrenheit (or, as Australians, Canadians, and lots of other folks would say:  about 27), but Houston and Abilene are projected to reach 70 degrees and it’s supposed to get up to 61 in Dallas.

So we’re getting set for a Texas Christmas Day, more or less, here in Queensland’s capital city.  And we’ll be with friends at dinner (which is what I grew up calling the noon meal), celebrating the blessings of a year of sadness and joy, gains and losses, all redeemed in the eyes of some of us by proof in November that American is still a democracy after all.

There is so much to be happy about here and at home.  One participant (she signed her posting just “L.”) on an Americans-in-Brisbane bulletin board listed several of the aspects of the United States and Australia that she especially appreciates.

I’ve categorized her comments and edited them for your consideration:

PLACES

•    Australia – The beauty of buildings in Tasmania, Ayers rock, the coloured sands of Rainbow Beach, sunset over Sydney Opera house, the birds that are so colourful, red outback dirt…

•    United States — the Rockies, the Grand Canyon, Niagara Falls, wild flowers, oak trees and giant Redwoods…

PEOPLE

•    I love that in Australia I don’t have to have a title (and) I can get more done with a friendly chat at the pub or shop than by dropping the name of the university I attended. And that when we first meet someone we don’t say “what do you do for a living”? Plus the Aussie sense of humour; it is beaut.

•    In the US, I love that we don’t ask when first meeting someone “how many kids do you have?”  Also that we are very good at invention and that our attitude is not “no worries” since sometimes we need to worry.  I am happy to be a mover, shaker, and get the job done no excuses person.

THINGS

•    In Australia, we don’t have 24-hour shops everywhere. Retail materialism is not quite full on.

FOOD

•    In Australia, pumpkin scones and Tim Tams, Tim Tams and more Tim Tams.

•    In the US: blackberries, cherries, apple pie, Reece’s peanut butter cups.

Although some of the things “L.” fondly misses (football US-style and muscle cars, for example) will never make my own list, I like her main point, which is that there is much to like about both countries and we miss the best of one when we’re in the other.

Until we’ve found a way to be in two places at once, though, that’s just life, isn’t it?  Like “L.,” I feel blessed to have two countries.

Merry Christmas from Down Under.  May 2009 avoid the worst of its mis-directions and fulfil the best of 2008’s promises.

Oh, and one more thing.  Kristi and I just learned a new Aussie-ism from our friend Nicola, a born Brisbanite: “fish-o.”  She has bought her contribution to hear family’s Christmas dinner, seafood, at the local fish-o.

Whether your Christmas dinner is coming from a fish-o, a beef-o, a pork-o, or a veggie farm, we wish you the very best.  – Bob, for Kristi and Nicola, too

{ 0 comments }

Gary’s final messages from this world

by Bob on December 10, 2008

Last week, in a small church in Cisco, Texas, my wife and I attended the funeral of my brother, Gary, who, after falling and hitting his head in a shower, lived for five weeks in what the doctors called “a locked-in state.”

Seeing him in his intensive care bed at Harris Methodist Hospital in Fort Worth, not moving, with his mouth open and his eyes closed, was a shock for me and for Kristi at first.  He looked dead then.

But he wasn’t. Over the next week or so, we visited him regularly, alone or with friends and other family members. One morning Kristi stood on one side of his hospital bed with her fingers in the palm of his inert left hand and I asked him to squeeze her fingers if he knew we were there.

Kristi burst into tears because the squeeze was so definite. Despite severe brain trauma that left him unable to open his eyes or speak, for the next few days he nodded in answer to questions, gave us more squeezes (once for “no” and twice for “yes”), moved his left hand up toward the tracheotomy which must have given him pain, and signalled “thumbs-up” and stuck out his tongue when asked to do so by a nurse. For one nurse, he even moved his lips to mouth words.

I am here and I know you are here with me, he told us with these limited signals, and when a doctor told us he could probably see, we held his eyelids open for him. Gary indicated that he could, in fact, see us clearly.  He could hear us.  He could respond.

With his permission (given by finger squeezes), we read aloud to him bits of an amazing book called My Stroke of Insight by Jill Taylor. From Taylor, though, we learned [click to continue…]

{ 9 comments }

Solo driving, one more time

by Bob on November 23, 2008

[Note: No change in my brother Gary’s condition, except that his hand-squeezes in responses to questions are much weaker now than they were when Kristi and I were first visiting with him in his hospital room. (See earlier blogs if you have no idea what I’m talking about.) The medical folk say head-injury patients cycle up and down in responsiveness, so we shouldn’t read too much into this.  I hope to be with him again after Thanksgiving.]

AUSTIN, TX – For about seven hours over the last two days, I’ve been doing something I may well never do again, but used to do a lot: I’ve been driving alone on Texas highways.

After saying what I hope is to be a temporary goodbye yesterday to my hospitalised brother, Gary, I drove on Interstate 20 west to Sweetwater to visit my other two brothers and their families.  Then, today, I drove to Austin, for a two-day total of about seven hours by myself in a car.

No telling how many hours I’ve spent alone on Interstate Highways during earlier eras in my life, driving across Texas, or between Texas and Massachusetts or Florida or California.  My cars broke down only now and then, and gas was, by today’s standards, almost free.

“Cheap” today means about $1.80 a gallon at most of the stations I passed today, but I was able to fill up in Sweetwater this morning for $1.65 a gallon, about half of the price unleaded cost here a year ago.  We happen to have returned during what will surely be a temporary price drop.

That makes it easier for me to decide to drive to Houston for Thanksgiving with Kristi and her family and then drive back to be with my family members, including Gary.  (I hope he’ll be more alert by then.) This adds to the “carbon footprint” of our trip, admittedly, though the big environmental costs must be the flights from Australia to here and back.

Even though I am making this road trip anyway (mea culpa), it’s probably progress that I know, now, more about the environmental costs of burning fossil fuels than I knew earlier when I roamed the highways so frequently.

And there are some other good signs that I saw today.  While I was rolling along open roads [click to continue…]

{ 4 comments }

Recalled: fanaticism and fatal folly

by Bob on November 19, 2008

FORT WORTH, TX — The hospital where my brother Gary was first a patient here, Harris Methodist, is near Kindred Hospital where he is now (no changes of significance in his condition so far).  It has provided us with a wonderful and inexpensive gym, for which we are grateful. In addition to letting us maintain some degree of fitness, that gym provided me the chance to glance through back issues of various magazines, including Texas Monthly.

Thank goodness for that, since the blaring big-screen TV in the work-out room is constantly tuned to the propaganda of Fox News.  I got it switched to CNN once, but it’s a hopeless battle.  At least I have headphones to tune out some of the blather.

An article in the April 2008 issue of the magazine helped me resolve the other day some long-standing issues I’ve had about the fiery conclusion of the 51-day standoff at the Branch Davidian compound near Waco, Texas, in 1993.

By Pamela Colloff, the article quotes directly from negotiators, law enforcement officials, Davidians who survived, and others and seems to be remarkably even-handed in its depiction of the tragedy that claimed the lives of law men and Davidians, 76 of them on the fiery last day, 27 of whom were children.

Based on what this article says, I am confirmed in my beliefs that bone-headed decisions on the part of law enforcement people created a situation which could have been avoided, made it worse at many points, and materially contributed to the final tragedy.  While all the surviving Davidians received jail terms (up to 40 years), only two law enforcement officials were fired and they were re-hired in lower-level jobs.

While confirming much of what I thought was likely true on many points, Colloff’s report told me much I didn’t know about David Koresh and the events of the day the compound burned out in high wind with so many trapped inside.

Koresh and his crew had stockpiled guns and ammunition.  He seems to have believed [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

From an ICU in the US

by Bob on November 11, 2008

KENDRED HOSPITAL, FORT WORTH, Sunday morning, Nov. 9 – Hospital time, my brother Mike says, isn’t like ordinary time, and I think he’s right.  Even for visitors, being in an artificially lit place with few windows to the outside seems to loosen one’s ties to signals of daylight, noontime, twilight and such.

How much more odd everything must seem for a patient, especially for a person in intensive care such as Gary, my brother who fell in a shower two weeks ago and banged his head so hard that he caused bleeding inside his skull.

Along with his wife, Kay, with Mike and our other brother Ronald, and with family members and friends, Kristi and I have been visiting with Gary off and on for several days now.

Jet lag and artificial environments form a disorienting mix and the shock of seeing Gary comatose in a hospital bed, looking dead, eyes closed, not moving … Well, it was all a bit hard to take at first.

After five days, first in Harris Methodist Hospital and now in this long-term care hospital, we are seeing signs of progress: small but steady increases in the movements of Gary’s left hand and arm, tiny eye-blinks, the movement of his left foot from side to side, nods of his head.

Our first moment of elation came when he squeezed our fingers in a “yes” response to “Can you hear us?”

A second came after a neurologist took the time to tell us that he knew of no reason why Gary would not be able to see if someone held his eye lids open.  We’ve been doing that and, with squeezes and slight nods, Gary has confirmed that he not only sees, but sees clearly although his eyes remain mostly fixed in place and his pupils are dilated.

We’ve been holding his eyes open while reading aloud to him from a brain scientist’s story of her own brain trauma, hospitalisation, and recovery, My Stroke of Insight by Jill Bolte Taylor (Viking, 2006).

It is an excellent account of what it’s like to be a wounded patient in the hospital system, and [click to continue…]

{ 2 comments }

A techno solution to fly-blown cow plops?

by Bob on October 31, 2008

Last Sunday, someone who had read a ‘dung beetles and cow plops’ blog I wrote two years ago sent me a message that was anonymous but encouraging.

(By the way, for those of you who read my last couple of blogs, my seriously ill brother in Fort Worth is showing slow but steady signs of improvement, so we’re deeply hopeful of getting to see him soon as he begins a long road to recovery.)

In that two-year-old blog, I wrote about a story in The Australian newspaper concerning dung beetles and how they have saved Australia from a plague of flies.

A writer named Julian Cribb reported that flies used to be so bad in many places here in Australia in the summertime that they were a health hazard.  Nobody wanted to be outdoors in their worst seasons because they’d quickly mob you, especially if you had worked up a sweat, which is easy to do in most places here around Christmas time.

Cribb’s article claimed that 270 million cow patties plop down on Aussie dirt every day.  Left on top of the ground for a couple of weeks, each of those bovine gifts can produce 3,000 flies.

Even with my limited math skills, I could calculate that 270 million cow plops times 3,000 per day for, say, 60 hot days  = a lot of flies.

Evidently that’s what happened each year until dung beetles were introduced in the 1960s and went to work balling up and burying bits of fresh cow stuff before flies could fill each plop with eggs destined to become maggots and then buzzing menaces to human (and animal) comfort.

“The greatest recycling enterprise in our national history,” Cribb wrote, came about because of the efforts of George Boremissza, coleopterist (beetle expert), who introduced the industrious little creatures to this land where so many non-native species – rabbits, foxes, cane toads — have produced natural disasters.

In 2006 Cribb worried that the drought Australia was going through (eased somewhat, now, but not yet ended) might kill off the beetles.  When soil is dry, it becomes too hard for the mighty little workers to dig into so that they can bury their balled-up plunder.

That buried dung enriches pastures, thereby increasing yields of meat, milk, and wool since the fertilized soil can support more steers, milk cows, and sheep. All of whom produce new sites of competition between flies and beetles, of course, every day, all year long.

Wait, the news gets worse.

George Boremissza’s beetle program was axed after a couple of decades, according to Cribb, and dung beetle science here is as dead as the dodo. Very few scientists are trying to figure out what to do if the beetles can’t continue to silently, daily, diligently save our necks from flies.

It’s not the kind of science that can lead to intellectual property capable of producing profit.  So flies, which are usually only a minor nuisance here now even in the summer, could make a devastating comeback.

But maybe not.  My anonymous blog reader sent this message to my old blog site as a comment: “I am working on an integrated solution right now. Watch for it in the Buckminster Fuller Challenge Idea Index entries for 2009.”

I will.  I hope your solution, dear reader of my old blog, is brilliant and cheap, even though it will be hard to compete with beetles, millions of them willing to work for… well, you know.

Hey, and what about this?  If the beetles die out and the ‘integrated solution’ falls short, we could all become vegetarian.  Fewer cows = fewer plops = fewer flies.

Sounds like a winning formula to me.

Wait, what was that sound?

Oh.

I think that, for many of you, my idea just plopped.

{ 0 comments }